14th February 2002, 08:19 pm
I’ve just received a mail with nothing but an executable file for
Windows attached. The mail even seams
to come from no other than myself :-) What exactly is it, that people
expect me to do with such a mail? Should I just blindly trust anything
that is sent to me from “me”? I don’t get it — are there really people
out there, that just thinks “Well, I don’t remember sending this file to
myself, but it could happen, that I send a file with a strange name for a
strange operating system… Let’s try it out!”
7th February 2002, 12:38 pm
Yesterday was a rather long day — or to put it more precisely, it
became a long day, when Manitou (Jérémy) and I decided to attend a
lecture about Models and Logic (the course is called
dModLog at
DAIMI). We had started our day at 8 O’clock and
was finished five hours later. But then we decided to go to the lecture —
it lasted for another three hours.
The lecture was really interesting, we heard about Finite Automata, which I
believe is also called Finite State Machines. We heard about languages and
how to define a Finite Automata in terms of five parameters: Q, Σ,
δ, q0, and F:
Q is a finite set of states. The states are the memory of the machine,
and in any given moment, the machine will be in exactly one of the states.
Σ is a finite input alphabet. It could be binary digits, the ASCII
characters or another finite set of symbols.
δ is a transition function δ: Q×Σ → Q. δ
is the function that makes the machine act on it’s input.
q0 ∈ Q is the start state of the machine, and
F ⊆ Q is the set of final, accepting states. If the machine is in a state
in F, then it will answer “Yes”, if not, then it will answer “No”.
You can take a look at the slides that were
used if you want to know more. I
hope to be able to follow the lectures loosly, as they’re going to prove
Gödel’s incompleteness theorem later. Ever since I first heard about
it, I’ve wanted to understand what it really says — I’ve only heard the
informal explaination of it, namely that it says, that there are things in
every closed system that cannot be proved, although they’re known to be
true. That sounds like a very fundamental theorem, and I’m really looking
forward to learning about it — if not this year, then definitely next
year, where dModLog will be part of our
mandatory courses.
5th February 2002, 07:18 pm
It’s expensive to live — I’ve just paid a total of 1,800 DKK (about 225
USD) in bills. And one of the bills was to
Netsite, so that Gimpster.com can remain online
for the next six months.
And then I’ve also bought books for the new term that has just begun. The
most exciting new class is the one about algorithms and datastructures.
It’s much more advanced than the introduction to Java we were presented
with when we started last summer, and the book looks good too. The book is
Algorithm Design — Foundations, Analysis, and Internet Examples by
Michael Goodrich and Roberto Tamassia. It says in the introduction that
it’s typeset with LaTeX so it can’t be
all bad ;-) Although I think they’ve made the margins a bit to narrow,
especially the right margin on the even pages (the pages that are to the
right). But well… that’s how it goes when people insist on changing the
standard layout LaTeX produces.
1st February 2002, 10:28 pm
I had my first day at DAIMI today after the
reading-holidays. I finished my exams about 14 days ago, so I haven’t been
studying that much lately :-) But that didn’t seam to effect our lecturer
— he just continued where he had stopped before Christmas.
It’s a little strange that we start on a Friday — I only found out about
it yesterday. I thought we could wait until Monday, but no… So I was at
the University this morning at 9 O’clock, where I found Manitou (Jérémy).
But we were the only two that turned up — even our instructor did come!
It was only around 12 O’clock that people started to arrive for the
lecture. Two hours later we were finished, and wanted to have a piece of
cake from MatKant. But they closed just
before we came! So, as you can tell, it’s been a rough day :-)
29th January 2002, 09:23 pm
The storm we had last night is over — it wasn’t that bad. The worst thing
about it was, that it kept me awake so that I was kind of tired, earlier
today, when I went to BioCity together with thoooms
(Thomas), Manitou (Jérémy) and his
girlfriend to see Lord of the Rings. The
storm also caused some other damages: a section of the wooden fence, that I
can see out of my window, is missing.
With regard to Lord of the Rings, then
what is there left for me to say? Other people have probably already told
you how great it is… But I’ll give it a try anyway :-)
So, let me start by saying that it’s a stunning movie — it’s really
amazing to see how Peter Jackson has managed to visualize the book.
Everything looks so real and feels so natural because it stays close to
the book. And when you see the film again (as I did today :-) then you can
really enjoy all the details, such as the over-sized carrots in Bilbo’s
kitchen. I also love the scene where Frodo sees Arwen for the first time
— the way she illuminates everything around her with her beauty. And
when you hear them speak Elvish — it’s so beautiful. And I could go on
and on and on…
It’s a great movie. I don’t know how it is if you haven’t read the books
and therefore knows nothing about Hobbits, Elves, Dwarfs, Wizards, and
Orcs, but I can imagine, that it must be a little strange at times.
One of the things that makes Tolkien so great, is that he has created an
entire world in these books. And the world has it’s own myths and legends
about the Ancient times. The different races that inhabit Middle-Earth all
have their own characteristics: the Hobbits like to eat all the time, the
Elves are beautiful and elegant, the Dwarfs are more “rough” and so on.
The movie gives examples of all these things, but I can imagine that it’s
easier to notice them, if you already knows about them :-)
If you want to hear other peoples oppenion about the film, then you should
head over to IMBd where they have a lot of
interesting reviews.