Comments on: Missing technology: Moon landings http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/ Adventures with Computers Mon, 21 May 2012 16:27:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-bleeding By: John http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/#comment-375070 John Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:29:05 +0000 http://mgeisler.net/?p=572#comment-375070 <p>The best thing to come out the space program thus far is Hubble. A close second is Tang!</p> The best thing to come out the space program thus far is Hubble. A close second is Tang!

]]> By: MDL http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/#comment-374616 MDL Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:07:04 +0000 http://mgeisler.net/?p=572#comment-374616 <p>The opinion of 'anonomous' is typical of an entire geeneration that cannot think for itself. They must latch on to any wing-nut theory because they lack the ability to focus long enough to actually learn something! We can debate who is at fault for this educational failure,debate untill the cows come home as there is enough blame to go around. I find it pitiful to think that all it takes to dismiss the greatest undertaking in human history is a couple of VERY poorly done and ill-researched pseudo-documentaries! P.S. .....it's spelled 'ANONYMOUS',bone head!!!</p> The opinion of ‘anonomous’ is typical of an entire geeneration that cannot think for itself.
They must latch on to any wing-nut theory because they lack the ability to focus long enough to actually learn something!
We can debate who is at fault for this educational failure,debate untill the cows come home as there is enough blame to go around.
I find it pitiful to think that all it takes to dismiss the greatest undertaking in human history is a couple of VERY poorly done and ill-researched pseudo-documentaries!
P.S. …..it’s spelled ‘ANONYMOUS’,bone head!!!

]]> By: Matt http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/#comment-167036 Matt Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:18:08 +0000 http://mgeisler.net/?p=572#comment-167036 <p>WOW u noobs thinking the thing was a hoax. Look up the word theory, theories dont prove things right or wrong they are just theories. Evidence is what proves things wrong. And you have none.</p> <p>The "letter" on the rock was a hair on the camera lens. do some research before you open your fat mouth.</p> <p>The LEM had a camera on its side that could film its landing. The filming of it taking off was from a camera the astronauts set up before they left. (DERR DERR DERR).</p> <p>The shadows faced different ways. Lets give you a lesson in elementary school science. When a surface is not flat, shadows from one light source (the sun) hit the ground in all different ways.</p> <p>The flag: The flag was not a normal everyday flag like here. It had solid wires around the perimeter to hold it up numbnuts. Try putting a regular flag in space.</p> <p>And another thing: The equipment would melt in space if they did not use something called insulation! Look at the LEM, they used golden foil on the bottom to insulate it. Same concept for equipment.</p> <p>Go on send me another theory and I will tell you why you are wrong: masterhobo24@yahoo.com</p> <p>Some people really make me sick</p> WOW u noobs thinking the thing was a hoax. Look up the word theory, theories dont prove things right or wrong they are just theories. Evidence is what proves things wrong. And you have none.

The “letter” on the rock was a hair on the camera lens. do some research before you open your fat mouth.

The LEM had a camera on its side that could film its landing. The filming of it taking off was from a camera the astronauts set up before they left. (DERR DERR DERR).

The shadows faced different ways. Lets give you a lesson in elementary school science. When a surface is not flat, shadows from one light source (the sun) hit the ground in all different ways.

The flag: The flag was not a normal everyday flag like here. It had solid wires around the perimeter to hold it up numbnuts. Try putting a regular flag in space.

And another thing: The equipment would melt in space if they did not use something called insulation! Look at the LEM, they used golden foil on the bottom to insulate it. Same concept for equipment.

Go on send me another theory and I will tell you why you are wrong: masterhobo24@yahoo.com

Some people really make me sick

]]> By: Ayui http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/#comment-53553 Ayui Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:29:07 +0000 http://mgeisler.net/?p=572#comment-53553 <p>NASA DID NOT FAKE THE FREAKING MOON LANDINGS!!! How stupid do you think NASA is? Don't you think instead of releasing pictures with flaws they would've checked everything for flaws? They woudn't release pictures that even the most naive people could see. You idiots!!!! YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES!</p> NASA DID NOT FAKE THE FREAKING MOON LANDINGS!!! How stupid do you think NASA is? Don’t you think instead of releasing pictures with flaws they would’ve checked everything for flaws? They woudn’t release pictures that even the most naive people could see. You idiots!!!! YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES!

]]> By: An fear mor http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/#comment-35318 An fear mor Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:04:27 +0000 http://mgeisler.net/?p=572#comment-35318 <p>links to pics not valid = fake</p> links to pics not valid = fake

]]> By: anonomous http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/#comment-16188 anonomous Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:36:16 +0000 http://mgeisler.net/?p=572#comment-16188 <p>i dont believe the moon landings are real... theories prove wrong this stupid hoax!! the flag waving, the letters on the rocks, the shadows, the light, and the camera eqipment would've been melted... AND how would the landing and take-off be filmed without a human on the surface? THIS IS A STUPID HOAX AND NASA SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES!! THEY HAVE AFFECTED THE MEDIA AND PARENTS ARE STILL TELLING THEIR CHILDREN TODAY THAT NEIL ARMSTRONG LANDED ON THE MOON! NASA SHOULD BE ASHAMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p> i dont believe the moon landings are real… theories prove wrong this stupid hoax!! the flag waving, the letters on the rocks, the shadows, the light, and the camera eqipment would’ve been melted… AND how would the landing and take-off be filmed without a human on the surface?
THIS IS A STUPID HOAX AND NASA SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES!! THEY HAVE AFFECTED THE MEDIA AND PARENTS ARE STILL TELLING THEIR CHILDREN TODAY THAT NEIL ARMSTRONG LANDED ON THE MOON! NASA SHOULD BE ASHAMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: Martin Geisler http://mgeisler.net/2005/07/missing-technology-moon-landings/#comment-371 Martin Geisler Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:14:19 +0000 http://mgeisler.net/?p=572#comment-371 <p>As could be expected, Stéphanie is against spending more money on space programs --- she would rather see the money spend on students from <a href="http://www.vs.ch/" rel="nofollow">Wallis</a>, who receive no money what so ever to support their university studies.</p> As could be expected, Stéphanie is against spending more money on space programs — she would rather see the money spend on students from Wallis, who receive no money what so ever to support their university studies.

]]>